• Home
  • The Blogs
  • From the Blogs
  • About Mark Ainley

Monthly Archives: March 2021

Egon Petri at 140

March 3

The German-born Dutch pianist Egon Petri has been a favourite of mine from my earliest years of collecting records. The APR label had put out the bulk of his 78rpm recordings on three double-CD sets and I was particularly mesmerized by his Liszt and Schubert-Liszt performances; my high school physics teacher, from whom I had learned a ton about historical piano recordings (but precious little about physics), had waxed rhapsodic about Petri’s Mazeppa and Ricordanza.

However, it was experiencing some of his 78s on an old turntable with built-in tube-amplified speakers that made me realize the power of his playing. A pianophile friend was visiting from Europe and we put on one of the Petri 78s I had on this system and it felt like Petri was in the room; the beauty and grandeur of his tone were more apparent to us than ever, despite the fact that we were both familiar with the recordings we listened to.

The more I explored Petri’s discography, the more I became aware that some of his studio discs were far more inspired than others and that his concert recordings seemed to capture his playing at its impassioned best. That said, he could still deliver stunning performances in the studio. This page will feature, in celebration of the pianist’s 140th birthday, a selection of his finest commercial and concert recordings.

Here are his first commercial discs, made at a studio session for German Electrola on September 17, 1929, and featuring some dazzling pianism. As I wrote about these performances in the booklet notes for the APR reissue of Petri’s entire 78 discography and first LPs (a commission for which I was truly honoured and grateful), ‘throughout, one marvels at his even articulation, sparkling tone, subtle pedalling, and gloriously shaped phrasing.’

 

The 78rpm disc that I consider his most successful is his glorious September 27, 1938 recording of Liszt’s transcription of Schubert’s lied ‘Gretchen am Spinnrade.’ What exquisitely-shaped phrasing, a beautifully sculpted line, wonderful layering, impassioned climaxes, and gorgeous nuancing – the long arc of his trajectory in this performance is magnificently achieved.

 

A few days before setting down that account, the pianist made on September 22, 1938 a recording of Liszt’s Piano Concerto No.2 in A Major, with Leslie Heward conducting the London Philharmonic Orchestra. This is a reference recording for this work and also one of Petri’s more successful studio efforts, with a wonderful balance of passion and sensitivity on display thanks to his beautiful sonority (his tone in lyrical sections is exquisite), broad dynamic range, refined phrasing, and impressive technical capacity (his octaves are terrific!).

 

As great as that studio recording is, the live account below shows how much more intensity he could bring to his playing in concert and makes for a fascinating comparison. I was less familiar with this live 1945 performance that circulated on a bootleg LP that eluded me for a long time, and now that it’s online, I can say that this version could well supplant Petri’s superb studio account in my estimation.

This performance has all the elegance, refinement, and dazzling technical mastery of his wonderful commercial recording with the bonus of more unbridled passion and propulsion. Aged 64 at the time of this reading, Petri sculpts his lines with burnished tone, mindful use of dynamics, and impeccable timing so as to highlight the emotional content of Liszt’s score – even though he lingers in lyrical passages, the faster sections are taken at quite a clip, resulting in a reading that’s a two minutes shorter than his commercial account and more animated and dramatic too.

 

Some magical broadcasts from 1930s reveal even more passion and vitality. Here is Petri playing the fourth movement of the Busoni Piano Concerto from a 1932 concert, with the Frankfurt Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by the great Hans Rosbaud. Petri was a disciple of the great Busoni – one of the pianist-composer’s three favourites – and so this recording is of particularly great historical importance.

Allan Evans, who discovered this performance and released it on his Arbiter label, recounted that he went to Melodiya’s offices in 1987: “Waited for a meeting room to be prepared (someone hurried inside with a reel of tape – not so subtle.) Met their archivist who claimed the entire 1936 broadcast [of the same concerto] existed minus the 1st movement, in a private collection. The Red Army took everything in 1945. Two years later during Perestroika the 1932 Busoni movement and most of Totentanz emerged. The 1936 performance seems to be missing unless an army officer will ‘fess up. Took a while to get them. Worth the effort.”

Worth the effort indeed. It is staggering that a 1932 broadcast should exist at all and in such amazing sound, and one shudders to think of the whole performance played this way by this great student of the composer; the 1936 Totentanz (with the opening missing) referred to above was also released by Allan on one of his Arbiter CDs and features equally stunning pianism (as shall be heard below the Busoni clip). This is absolutely thrilling playing, with the easily surmounting the technical challenges of this work despite playing at breakneck speed – what octaves, with incredible voicing and rhythmic vitality. A truly remarkable document!

 

And here is that other supremely important discovery by Evans, a stellar 1936 reading by Petri of Liszt’s Totentanz, again with the great Rosbaud on the podium. The first 78 transcription disc was not in the archive when Allan Evans rescued the rest of this performance from oblivion, but what a performance it is: thrilling passagework, massive tone, and rhythmically and emotionally charged playing.

 

One of Petri’s granddaughters told me that in the late 1950s, the pianist had gone to Switzerland in the hopes of teaching as his career was not going at its best, but that enrolment for his masterclasses was disappointingly far less than had been expected: it is sad and staggering to consider that only three students enrolled (one of whom was John Ogden). This recital given before those classes shows no sign that the pianist was in his late 70s at the time: his tone is rich and lush, articulation clear and precise, phrasing beautifully shaped, and timing natural and spacious.

 

Below is another marvellous concert performance of Petri late in life, a glorious account Beethoven’s Piano Concerto No.4 in G Major Op.58. This recording was originally issued on a private LP Encore PHS-1277 which gave no date nor indication of the orchestra or conductor – a kind commenter on my YouTube upload has stated that it is the Carmel Symphony Orchestra, with an unidentified conductor, from a December 8, 1959 concert.

Petri put a few concerted works on disc in the 1930s and 40s, and several Beethoven Sonatas in both the 78rpm and LP eras, but he never recorded any of his concertos. A performance of the Emperor Concerto circulated much more widely than the interpretation of the Fourth below, which is a fascinating and insightful performance worthy of attention despite the unfortunately harsh sound of the amateur recording of this concert reading. His left hand voicing in the first movement cadenza, for example, is wonderfully highlighted with a level of robust dramatic inflection, in addition to a few personal touches that highlight the emotional depth of the work. Throughout the entire performance, we hear Petri’s bold emphases tempered by fluid legato phrasing, refined nuancing (what a wonderful pianissimo), and attentive voicing (notice the balance of his chords).

 

If Petri wasn’t always at his peak in the studio, it does not mean that his studio performances are not worth hearing. This 1956 account of Beethoven’s titanic Hammerklavier Sonata Op.106 for Westminster (for which label he produced several LPs) is a grand and noble reading, capturing with great fidelity the pianist’s gorgeous tonal palette (including a massive bass sonority), transparent voicing, and refined nuancing.

 

One of the greatest recordings we have of Petri is one that could very well have disappeared into thin air: a 1950s practice session of Alkan’s treacherous Symphony for Solo Piano Op.39 that was captured on tape in a Mills College practice room by his pupil Daniell Revenaugh, who told me about the experience when I met him about a decade ago. Revenaugh had to pull the microphone away from the piano partway through the first movement because the levels were peaking due to Petri’s volcanic playing.

This is indeed some utterly stupendous pianism here, the kind that gives us a much better idea of Petri’s true capabilities. The playing throughout features soaring phrasing, grandly shaped lines, clearly balanced voicing, wonderfully weighted chords, and rhythmic dynamism. The dramatic content and progression of the first movement is absolutely mesmerizing, and I’ve often listened over and over to that single section of the work in absolute awe. And this was simply a practice session – and at a time when Alkan’s music was not being widely played at all (this is before Raymond Lewenthal helped revive interest in the composer’s works). Stunning pianism by a grand master!

 

To close, Petri playing two of his own Bach transcriptions in a 1958 recording that showcases his beautiful full-bodied tone, fluid phrasing, and transparent voicing – a master musician at work, one whom we are fortunate to be able to appreciate in so many hours of superb recordings.

 

 

An Introduction to Historical Piano Recordings

March 3

I was delighted to have been invited by the Ross McKee Foundation in San Francisco to present a filmed introduction to historical piano recordings. I was approached several months ago about the possibility of presenting one of their monthly Piano Talks, now taking place online due to CoVid circumstances. Usually they would work with local speakers but since everything had shifted to an online platform, they were able to extend the invitation to those living elsewhere – an opportunity for which I am extremely grateful.

We discussed a bit what topic I should choose – whether I should focus specifically on a particular pianist or on certain styles of playing – and then we decided that a general introduction to historical recordings would be preferable as there’s not much of this kind of ‘entry-level’ exposé available on the topic.

One of the challenges of a presentation lasting only around 45 minutes is how little could be covered in such a broad topic – I wanted to cover salient points of observation and also present some recordings, and so I had to make some alterations to what I’d originally hoped to include (my first attempt at filming was well over an hour). So while the musical examples are relatively brief, I think that I’ve covered the key issues relating to historical piano recordings and introduced a few performances and artists that demonstrate their great value and importance.

Going through the process of filming, I can truly empathize with how musicians feel in a studio with no audience and just interfacing with equipment – it is no surprise to me that the playing of pianists can be different in concert than in such conditions…  I am certainly somewhat more vivacious when not only facing a recording machine! I eventually warmed up and settled into ‘film mode’ and I think the points get across… but I do understand why Schnabel referred to the recording studio as ‘the torture chamber!’

And so, here is the video – and beneath, I will elaborate on a few points!

 

One question that was posted to my Facebook page after posting this video had to do with the pianos and the artists’ timbre, as I’d mentioned that certain pianists are so distinctive as to be instantly recognizable, but one reader stated that perhaps the choice of instrument can sometimes be what makes a performance so distinctive, such as the very special piano used in Marcelle Meyer’s “Ondine” performance.

The piano Meyer used was indeed remarkable, and although it sounds more like a Pleyel or Erard, it is in fact a Hamburg Steinway chosen for Les Discophiles Français by Lili Kraus, and it is the same piano used by Kraus, Meyer, and Yves Nat for their recordings on that label, and is most likely the ones used in other sessions engineered by André Charlin at the Studio Adyar around the same time, which includes Germaine Thyssens-Valentin for her Fauré cycle and Albert Ferber for his Debussy cycle. While there is indeed some similarity between what we hear amongst these pianists, there is also quite a difference – the trills in Nat’s Brahms Handel Variations puts one in mind of what one hears in Meyer’s Rameau, but in many ways we hear very different playing and sonorities elsewhere. And in recordings of Meyer made elsewhere – including Swiss and Italian broadcasts – her tone, touch, and approach are still distinctive even if the sonority is not 100% the same.

The same goes for Steinway 299 used at EMI’s Abbey Road Studio. The late 1940s/early 1950s recordings by Lipatti, Solomon, Cortot, Schnabel, Moiseiwitsch, and Anda all used that same piano, yet I would say that I can recognize a number of these pianists by their tone and style when on other pianos too, in recordings made in different periods or in the case of Anda at the same time (some broadcast recordings from the 1950s demonstrate the same deftness of touch and rhythmic bite), and that’s certainly the case for Lipatti – we know Cortot used a Bluthner for his Prelude, Chorale et Fugue in 1929 but you can recognize his tone in that recording as you can in the late 1940s on Steinway 299.

I do think that the instrument and engineering make a big difference in all these cases, but I don’t think it’s the only factor … we do hear, to choose two pianists particularly close to my heart, Meyer and Lipatti’s distinctive tone, touch, and approach in their recordings on other instruments and in different conditions too.

As for where these beautiful instruments are now: someone mentioned in a recent comment on my Facebook page that the Steinway 299 was sold at auction years ago. In 2008 I spoke with the elderly gentleman who owned the one used in Meyer’s recordings – he unfortunately lived too far from Paris where I was briefly visiting for me to go in person at that time. He had worked at the sessions and shared some interesting details about them and the piano, including Yves Nat’s intense dislike for the instrument, and the colourful language he used to curse at it. I hope this one has been well preserved as well. And: when I introduced Harold C Schonberg to Meyer’s playing around 1989 – he had never heard her before and I sent him a cassette – he made a point of talking about how much he loved the piano, which he noted was more light-actioned than a Steinway… I think no one could have expected that it was!

The pianos used back then were indeed different than the kinds of pianos we have now – there’s been a movement towards a brighter sound in recent decades – but I don’t believe that pianos are the only thing that have changed, as the playing clearly is different … though some of the pianos used in pre- and post-War recordings are indeed wonderful instruments!

As stated in the introduction, this topic is certainly a rich one beyond the scope of a 45-minute presentation, but I think it is a worthy exploration and I hope you’ll enjoy it!

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Forgotten Genius: Muriel Kerr

March 3

One of the great joys of running my Facebook page for the last 11+ years is coming across great pianists I’d never heard of. In the past one had to find a record in a shop (in my case, usually second-hand) and take a gamble on whether to buy the disc, but now with YouTube and other online platforms we can unexpectedly find and quickly listen to artists we might never have encountered.

A Muriel Kerr booking ad

In December 2020 while browsing through YouTube I stumbled across a pianist that I had never heard of or heard before and I’m still trying to regain my composure, as the playing is in my opinion so staggeringly jaw-dropping that I am utterly flummoxed at how she could have been so forgotten. Muriel Kerr was a Canadian artist who ended up in the US, dying prematurely in 1963 at the age of 52.

Born in Regina on January 18, 1911, Kerr studied initially with Paul Wells in Toronto, with Alexander Raab in Chicago, and with Percy Grainger (I’m not sure where or for how long). After a Canadian tour in 1922, she began an extensive period of studies in New York with Ernest Hutcheson – she became his favourite pupil and later his assistant. She won the Schubert Memorial Competition at Julliard in 1928, which gave her the opportunity to record an RCA 78rpm disc (below) and to play the Rachmaninoff Second Concerto at Carnegie Hall with Willem Mengelberg conducting the New York Philharmonic on December 5, 1928, by which point Leopold Godowsky had proclaimed her ‘the most gifted pianist in America.’

She taught extensively throughout the US, beginning at Juilliard from 1942 to 1952 (David Bar-Illan was among her pupils). She joined the faculty of the School of Music at the University of Southern California in 1955, where she would teach until her death in 1963, simultaneously acting as director of the Punahou Music School in Honolulu. Apparently she still played throughout her teaching career: her first European tour took place in 1948, and her pupil Neil Stannard wrote of a chamber music concert in which she played the Brahms Piano Quartet in C Minor Op. 60 with fellow some USC faculty members: Heifetz, Piatigorsky, and Primrose! That’s a pretty top-tier group of musicians right there … what I wouldn’t give to hear a recording of that performance!

Stannard shared that “as a teacher, she was more a doer than a sayer. That is, her demonstrations were inspiring and thought-provoking, while her technical observations were more along the lines of “get after that.” She was a musician’s musician and everyone loved her. One of the first impressions I have of her was her standing on the landing of the grand staircase in Clark House cradling a large kettle and waving a ladle in the air. ‘Who wants some soup?'”

Sadly, Kerr died suddenly as the result of an asthma attack, at the tragically young age of 52. Stannard was the first pupil to find out: he had arrived early to the fall semester registration to be sure that he could sign up for lessons with Kerr, only to be told by a shaken administrator that she had died the night before.

Kerr recorded her sole 78 in 1928 – only one of the two Scriabin works on the disc has been reissued – and a single LP in 1951 on the small Hyperion label, featuring works by Schumann and Hindemith; the latter was reissued on RCA Victor after she died, royalties for this ‘special products’ LP to be contributed to the Muriel Kerr Memorial Scholarship Fund at the USC. It is indeed lamentable that this great artist should have a recorded output lasting barely 40 minutes, and it is certainly to be hoped that some concert performances will be found and made available.

Aged 17 at the time she cut her RCA Victor 78, Kerr plays with the authority and command that characterizes the playing on her LP recording, qualities referenced in most concert reviews (a review of her 1945 New York recital featuring the Liszt Sonata compared her to the legendary Teresa Carreño). With long lines in lyrical passages and clarity of texture throughout, Kerr’s playing features consistently beautiful tone, marvellous pedal technique, and wonderful dynamic control.

 

The first recording of Kerr that I came across on YouTube was some Schumann from a transfer of the memorial RCA Victor LP and I was mesmerized from beginning to end – the upload had a mere 35 views at the time, tragic in my opinion given the absolute mastery on display in the playing. Fortunately, the piano community kicked into high gear when I posted excitedly about the artist on my Facebook page: within 24 hours I had not only received the 78 transfer linked above but also a much cleaner transfer of the RCA vinyl, which I have now uploaded to YouTube and embedded below. I have opted to present the Schumann portions prior to the Hindemith (reverse order to the vinyl) to provide a bit more of a chronological flow.

We can hear in her stunning performance of the Schumann Novelette Op. 21 No. 8 that Kerr had stupendous technique, additionally playing with blazing passion and truly refined musicality. Her magnificent tone, stunning clarity of texture, gloriously sculpted phrasing, mindful use of dynamics, and impeccable timing – particularly at transitions – all captivate me. For those who find it harder to recognize the refinement in her playing amidst the intensity in this first performance on the disc, her account of the Fantasiestücke No. 2 in A-flat Major Op. 111 reveals to perfection her gorgeous tonal colours, sumptuous legato phrasing, clarity of texture, and soaring phrasing, while the Fantasiestücke No.1 in C Minor Op. 111 also receives a masterful performance, with incredible momentum that highlights the work’s inner intensity without being overly driven, with that distinctive clarity of phrasing and texture that characterizes her other recordings. As for the Hindemith, Kerr’s traversal of his Piano Sonata No.3 is as lyrically phrased and transparent in texture as her Schumann.

 

Renowned pianist Kirill Gerstein became fascinated by the artist when he saw my Facebook posts and started doing his own online digging, in so doing coming across this 1953 WNYC interview with the pianist, in which she speaks about using music education to help disabled veterans – a wonderful testament to her dedication as a teacher:

 

 

I will be adding to this page as information and recordings make themselves available, so if anyone out there knows of this artist or has any recordings, please let me know. In the meantime, I hope you will enjoy the truly superb playing of this utterly remarkable musician, sadly taken from us much too soon.

 

Recent Posts
  • Josef Lhévinne at 150
  • Josef Lhévinne at 150
  • Marguerite Long at 150
  • Marguerite Long at 150
  • Notes for Piano Library: Westminster & American Decca on Eloquence
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • September 2024
    • July 2024
    • May 2024
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • November 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • May 2017
    • February 2017
    • September 2016
    • July 2016
    • May 2016
    • October 2015
    • August 2015
    • May 2015
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • July 2012
    • April 2012
    • February 2012
    • September 2011
    • July 2011
    Categories
    • Dinu Lipatti
    • Sense of Space
    • The Piano Files
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    © 2014 | Theme Luxe